Avoiding omnidoxasticity in logics of belief: A reply to MacPherson

DOI10.1305/ndjfl/1040149361zbMath0850.03017OpenAlexW2165887196MaRDI QIDQ1906677

Nigel Shadbolt, Kieron O'Hara, Han Reichgelt

Publication date: 17 July 1996

Published in: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1040149361

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Other nonclassical logic (03B60) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (3)

Mythical systems: mathematic and logical theory ⋮ Chemistry of belief ⋮ Pathology of collective doxa. Automata models

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Is it possible that belief isn't necessary?
• Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning
• Some admissible rules in nonnormal modal systems
• Resolution theorem proving in reified modal logics
• On alternatives in epistemic logic
• Some theorems in the metric theory of diophantine approximation

This page was built for publication: Avoiding omnidoxasticity in logics of belief: A reply to MacPherson