Network competition with price discrimination: `bill-and-keep' is not so bad after all

DOI10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00171-XzbMath1254.90034MaRDI QIDQ1927388

Carlo Cambini, Tommaso M. Valletti

Publication date: 1 January 2013

Published in: Economics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

qualitytelecommunicationsinterconnectioninvestments

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Communication networks in operations research (90B18) Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets) (91B24) Economic models of real-world systems (e.g., electricity markets, etc.) (91B74)

Related Items (4)

Network competition with price discrimination: `bill-and-keep' is not so bad after all ⋮ Bill-and-keep vs. cost-based access pricing revisited ⋮ Mobile phone termination charges with asymmetric regulation ⋮ Entry, access pricing, and welfare in the telecommunications industry

Cites Work

• Network competition with price discrimination: `bill-and-keep' is not so bad after all
• Using `bill and keep' interconnect arrangements to soften network competition

This page was built for publication: Network competition with price discrimination: `bill-and-keep' is not so bad after all