The concept of relevance and the logic diagram tradition
DOI10.1007/s11787-010-0014-1zbMath1255.03016OpenAlexW4211107765MaRDI QIDQ1931345
Publication date: 25 January 2013
Published in: Logica Universalis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-010-0014-1
relevant logicAristotleentailmentmodus ponenslogic diagramsBertrand RussellVenn diagramstruth tablesdisjunctive syllogismLudwig WittgensteinW. V. O. QuineAlan Ross AndersonCharles Ssanders PeirceGottlop FregeNuel D. Belnaptruth-grounds
Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Substructural logics (including relevance, entailment, linear logic, Lambek calculus, BCK and BCI logics) (03B47)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Verisimilitude and content
- Modal translations in substructural logics
- Philosophy and geometry. Theoretical and historical issues
- Creative and non-creative definitions in the calculus of probability
- The undecidability of entailment and relevant implication
- Relevant implication
- On Entailment
- Compatibility and relevance: Bolzano and Orlov
- The graphic-linguistic distinction
- Aligning logical and psychological perspectives on diagrammatic reasoning
- Cognitive science approaches to understanding diagrammatic representations
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: The concept of relevance and the logic diagram tradition