Competing allocation principles: time for compromise?

DOI10.1007/S11238-011-9289-9zbMath1281.91107OpenAlexW1980308885MaRDI QIDQ1934268

Lars Schwettmann

Publication date: 28 January 2013

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9289-9

zbMATH Keywords

needsefficiencyequalityresponsibilityquestionnaireallocation rulesdistributive justice

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)

Related Items (1)

Need, equity, and accountability. Evidence on third-party distribution decisions from a vignette study

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Envy freeness in experimental fair division problems
• On the relative strengths of altruism and fairness
• Evaluation via extended orderings: empirical findings from Western and Eastern Europe
• The Bargaining Problem
• Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem
• Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle

This page was built for publication: Competing allocation principles: time for compromise?