Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1945663
DOI10.1007/s11238-011-9282-3zbMath1273.91108OpenAlexW2142139961MaRDI QIDQ1945663
Mohammed Abdellaoui, Hilda Kammoun, Han Bleichrodt
Publication date: 8 April 2013
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9282-3
Related Items (9)
All at once! A comprehensive and tractable semi-parametric method to elicit prospect theory components ⋮ Moment Risks: Investment for Self and for a Firm ⋮ On discrimination in health insurance ⋮ PROFIT SHARING IN HEDGE FUNDS ⋮ Divergent risk-attitudes and endogenous collateral constraints ⋮ Determinants of investor expectations and satisfaction. A study with financial professionals ⋮ Myopic loss aversion, reference point, and money illusion ⋮ Optimal frequency of portfolio evaluation in a choice experiment with ambiguity and loss aversion ⋮ BEHAVIORAL PORTFOLIO CHOICE UNDER HYPERBOLIC ABSOLUTE RISK AVERSION
Cites Work
- Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: experimental arguments based on prospect theory
- Learning in the Allais paradox
- Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie
- Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
- An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory
- The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments
- An index of loss aversion
- The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. (With commentaries)
- Prospect Theory and Asset Prices
- Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
- Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
- Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle
This page was built for publication: Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study
