The effect of differential recruitment, non-response and non-recruitment on estimators for respondent-driven sampling

DOI10.1214/11-EJS630zbMath1274.62103arXiv1012.4122OpenAlexW2044503939MaRDI QIDQ1952213

Krista J. Gile, Amber Tomas

Publication date: 28 May 2013

Published in: Electronic Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.4122

zbMATH Keywords

non-responserespondent driven sampling

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05)

Related Items (6)

Unequal edge inclusion probabilities in link-tracing network sampling with implications for respondent-driven sampling ⋮ Estimating hidden population size using respondent-driven sampling data ⋮ Correcting for differential recruitment in respondent-driven sampling data using ego-network information ⋮ Respondent-driven sampling on directed networks ⋮ A simulation-based framework for assessing the feasibility of respondent-driven sampling for estimating characteristics in populations of lesbian, gay and bisexual older adults ⋮ Bias–variance and breadth–depth tradeoffs in respondent-driven sampling

Uses Software

• statnet
• RDS

Cites Work

• Modeling social networks from sampled data
• Improved Inference for Respondent-Driven Sampling Data With Application to HIV Prevalence Estimation
• A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
• On the Theory of Sampling from Finite Populations

This page was built for publication: The effect of differential recruitment, non-response and non-recruitment on estimators for respondent-driven sampling