Is set modeling of white noise a good tool for robust \({\mathcal H}_2\) analysis?

DOI10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00137-5zbMath0941.93016OpenAlexW2167859966MaRDI QIDQ1962007

Jorge Tierno, Mario Sznaier

Publication date: 10 April 2000

Published in: Automatica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00137-5

zbMATH Keywords

design\(H_2\) analysisconservative resultsset membership modellingworst case \(H_2\) performance

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sensitivity (robustness) (93B35) Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.) (93B51) Identification in stochastic control theory (93E12)

Related Items (1)

A convex approach to robust \({\mathcal H}_{2}\) performance analysis

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Mixed \({\mathcal H}_ 2/{\mathcal H}_{\infty}\) control for discrete-time systems via convex optimization
• Analysis of Robust H2 Performance Using Multiplier Theory
• The robust H/sub 2/ control problem: a worst-case design
• Loop transfer recovery for nonminimum phase plants
• The LQG/LTR procedure for multivariable feedback control design
• LQG control with an H/sup infinity / performance bound: a Riccati equation approach
• Mixed ℋ/sub 2/ and ℋ/sub ∞/ performance objectives. I. Robust performance analysis
• Mixed ℋ/sub 2/ and ℋ/sub ∞/ performance objectives. II. Optimal control
• An exact solution to general SISO mixed ℋ/sub 2//ℋ/sub ∞/ problems via convex optimization
• Frequency domain conditions for robust H/sub 2/ performance
• Multiobjective H/sub 2//H/sub ∞/ control
• A set-based approach for white noise modeling

This page was built for publication: Is set modeling of white noise a good tool for robust \({\mathcal H}_2\) analysis?