The lottery preparation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1964017

DOI10.1016/S0168-0072(99)00010-XzbMath0949.03045arXivmath/9808012WikidataQ56813202 ScholiaQ56813202MaRDI QIDQ1964017

Joel David Hamkins

Publication date: 3 December 2000

Published in: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9808012




Related Items (56)

Identity crises and strong compactness. III: Woodin cardinalsIndestructibility properties of Ramsey and Ramsey-like cardinalsCoding into HOD via normal measures with some applicationsMixed Levels of IndestructibilityFailures of SCH and level by level equivalenceINDESTRUCTIBILITY WHEN THE FIRST TWO MEASURABLE CARDINALS ARE STRONGLY COMPACTThe least strongly compact can be the least strong and indestructibleDiamond (on the regulars) can fail at any strongly unfoldable cardinalOn extendible cardinals and the GCHUnnamed ItemSupercompactness and level by level equivalence are compatible with indestructibility for strong compactnessStrongly uplifting cardinals and the boldface resurrection axiomsOn supercompactness and the continuum functionInner-model reflection principlesInner models with large cardinal features usually obtained by forcingAbsoluteness via resurrectionIndestructibility of Vopěnka's principleIndestructible strong compactness but not supercompactnessResurrection axioms and uplifting cardinals2007 European Summer Meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic: Logic Colloquium '07Hierarchies of forcing axioms INORMAL MEASURES ON A TALL CARDINALOn some properties of Shelah cardinalsA Laver-like indestructibility for hypermeasurable cardinalsThe consistency of level by level equivalence with $V = {\rm HOD}$, the Ground Axiom, and instances of square and diamondLarge cardinals need not be large in HODLocal saturation of the non-stationary ideal over \(\mathcal P_{\kappa}\lambda\)The least weakly compact cardinal can be unfoldable, weakly measurable and nearly \(\theta\)-supercompactHIERARCHIES OF FORCING AXIOMS, THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS AND SQUARE PRINCIPLESUniversal indestructibility for degrees of supercompactness and strongly compact cardinalsCharacterizations of the weakly compact ideal on \(P_\kappa\lambda\)Indestructibility, instances of strong compactness, and level by level inequivalenceAn equiconsistency for universal indestructibilityIndestructible Strong Compactness and Level by Level Equivalence with No Large Cardinal RestrictionsJOINT DIAMONDS AND LAVER DIAMONDSThe weakly compact reflection principle need not imply a high order of weak compactnessIndestructibility and destructible measurable cardinalsSuperstrong and other large cardinals are never Laver indestructibleLaver and set theorySet-theoretic geologyThe tree property at the \(\aleph_{2 n}\)'s and the failure of SCH at \(\aleph_\omega\)Strongly compact cardinals and the continuum functionThe proper and semi-proper forcing axioms for forcing notions that preserve ℵ₂ or ℵ₃Large cardinals and definable well-orders on the universeIndestructibility and stationary reflectionIndestructibility under adding Cohen subsets and level by level equivalenceOn spaces with $\sigma$-closed-discrete dense setsThe failure of GCH at a degree of supercompactnessStrongly unfoldable cardinals made indestructibleTall cardinalsIndestructible strong compactness and level by level inequivalenceA universal indestructibility theorem compatible with level by level equivalenceLarge cardinals with few measuresIndestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactnessBlowing up the power set of the least measurableMORE ON THE PRESERVATION OF LARGE CARDINALS UNDER CLASS FORCING



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: The lottery preparation