Multiple comparison procedures for optimally discriminating between good, equivalent, and bad treatments with respect to a control
DOI10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00104-4zbMath0979.62048MaRDI QIDQ1970861
Guido Giani, Klaus Strassburger
Publication date: 18 February 2002
Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)
tablesnormal distributionsample size determinationmultiple testtwo-sided testleast favorable parameter configurationtype III errorsminimax partition procedurequasiconcave distributionsubset selection procdure
Hypothesis testing in multivariate analysis (62H15) Minimax procedures in statistical decision theory (62C20) Statistical ranking and selection procedures (62F07) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)
Related Items (3)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Sample size determination for step-down multiple test procedures: Orthogonal contrasts and comparisons with a control
- Control of directional errors with stagewise multiple test procedures
- Software for selection procedures
- On the modified s-method and directional errors
- Multiple Comparisons and Type III Errors
- Multiple Three-Decision Rules for Parametric Signs
- Testing and Selecting for Equivalence With Respect to a Control
- Extension of two-sided test to multiple treatment trials
- Optimum Partition Procedures for Separating Good and Bad Treatments
- On Partitioning a Set of Normal Populations by Their Locations with Respect to a Control
- Optimal allocation of observations for partitioning a set of normal populations in comparison with a control
This page was built for publication: Multiple comparison procedures for optimally discriminating between good, equivalent, and bad treatments with respect to a control