When is a phylogenetic network simply an amalgamation of two trees?

DOI10.1007/s11538-018-0463-xzbMath1400.92378OpenAlexW2840568513WikidataQ89451201 ScholiaQ89451201MaRDI QIDQ1990144

Charles Semple, Jack Simpson

Publication date: 24 October 2018

Published in: Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-0463-x

zbMATH Keywords

phylogenetic networkstree-based networksreticulation-visible networksstack-free networks

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Problems related to evolution (92D15) Applications of graph theory (05C90)

Related Items (2)

Classes of explicit phylogenetic networks and their biological and mathematical significance ⋮ Generation of orchard and tree-child networks

Cites Work

• Phylogenetic networks with every embedded phylogenetic tree a base tree
• Reticulation-visible networks
• On the existence of infinitely many universal tree-based networks
• Do branch lengths help to locate a tree in a phylogenetic network?
• Phylogenetic networks that display a tree twice
• Size of a phylogenetic network
• Reconstructing evolution of sequences subject to recombination using parsimony
• A decomposition theorem and two algorithms for reticulation-visible networks
• Seeing the trees and their branches in the network is hard
• Locating a tree in a phylogenetic network
• A universal tree-based network with the minimum number of reticulations
• New characterisations of tree-based networks and proximity measures
• Hybridization Number on Three Rooted Binary Trees is EPT

This page was built for publication: When is a phylogenetic network simply an amalgamation of two trees?