On the wildness of Cambrian lattices

DOI10.1007/s10468-018-9789-1zbMath1436.16014arXiv1704.01861OpenAlexW2606437022WikidataQ129884851 ScholiaQ129884851MaRDI QIDQ2000889

Baptiste Rognerud, Frédéric Chapoton

Publication date: 1 July 2019

Published in: Algebras and Representation Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01861

zbMATH Keywords

posetrepresentation typeCambrian

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Representation type (finite, tame, wild, etc.) of associative algebras (16G60) Representations of quivers and partially ordered sets (16G20) Cluster algebras (13F60)

Related Items (2)

Ungarian Markov chains ⋮ The bounded derived categories of the Tamari lattices are fractionally Calabi-Yau

Uses Software

• MathOverflow

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Oriented flip graphs of polygonal subdivisions and noncrossing tree partitions
• Sortable elements and Cambrian lattices.
• Partially ordered sets of finite type
• Homological properties of piecewise hereditary algebras.
• On derived equivalences of categories of sheaves over finite posets
• Cambrian lattices.
• Stokes posets and serpent nests
• Generalized noncrossing partitions and combinatorics of Coxeter groups
• PARTIALLY ORDERED SETS OF INFINITE TYPE
• Representation-tame incidence algebras of finite posets
• The completely separating incidence algebras of tame representation type
• Which Canonical Algebras are Derived Equivalent to Incidence Algebras of Posets?

This page was built for publication: On the wildness of Cambrian lattices