On the equivalence between iterated application of choice rules and common belief of applying these rules
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2002344
DOI10.1016/j.geb.2019.03.015zbMath1417.91127OpenAlexW2936516699WikidataQ128086936 ScholiaQ128086936MaRDI QIDQ2002344
Publication date: 12 July 2019
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://www2.wiwi.uni-jena.de/Papers/jerp2014/wp_2014_032.pdf
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- An indistinguishability result on rationalizability under general preferences
- Iterated regret minimization: a new solution concept
- Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
- Collusive behavior in noncooperative epsilon-equilibria of oligopolies with long but finite lives
- Choice functions, rationality conditions, and variations on the weak axiom of revealed preference
- Preference, rationalizability and equilibrium
- Fixed set theory for closed correspondences with applications to self-similarity and games.
- Common belief in approximate rationality
- Hierarchies of compact beliefs and rationalizable behavior
- The role of monotonicity in the epistemic analysis of strategic games
- Iterated strict dominance in general games
- Hierarchies of beliefs for compact possibility models
- Statistical decision functions which minimize the maximum risk
- The Language of Game Theory
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior
- Rationalizability and Correlated Equilibria
- General theory of best variants choice: Some aspects
- Variational Analysis
- Pure Strategy Dominance
- AN EPISTEMIC RATIONALE FOR ORDER INDEPENDENCE
- Admissibility in Games
- Existence and Uniqueness of Maximal Reductions Under Iterated Strict Dominance
- Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model
- The Theory of Statistical Decision
This page was built for publication: On the equivalence between iterated application of choice rules and common belief of applying these rules