If nudge cannot be applied: a litmus test of the readers' stance on paternalism

DOI10.1007/s11238-013-9375-2zbMath1290.91048OpenAlexW2019893511MaRDI QIDQ2015038

Chen Li, Zhi-Hua Li, Peter P. Wakker

Publication date: 18 June 2014

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-013-9375-2

zbMATH Keywords

debiasinglibertarian paternalismchoice inconsistencynudgestandard gamble

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Reconciling normative and behavioural economics: the problems to be solved
• The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?
• Why we should not be silent about noise
• The shape of incomplete preferences
• Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom.
• Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice
• Explaining risky choices without assuming preferences
• Rationality for economists? (With commentaries)
• Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. (With commentaries)
• Multiperson utility
• Is Addiction "Rational"? Theory and Evidence
• The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
• Making Descriptive Use of Prospect Theory to Improve the Prescriptive Use of Expected Utility
• Using a Bayesian Approach to Quantify Scale Compatibility Bias
• Resolving Inconsistencies in Utility Measurement Under Risk: Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility
• Randomization vs. Selection: How to Choose in the Absence of Preference?
• Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty
• Inconsistent Trade-Offs Between Attributes: New Evidence in Preference Assessment Biases
• Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics^*

This page was built for publication: If nudge cannot be applied: a litmus test of the readers' stance on paternalism