Randomized versus non-randomized hypergeometric hypothesis testing with crisp and fuzzy hypotheses
DOI10.1007/s00362-018-1058-1zbMath1467.62071OpenAlexW2903122433WikidataQ128897596 ScholiaQ128897596MaRDI QIDQ2029225
Arne Johannssen, Nataliya Chukhrova
Publication date: 3 June 2021
Published in: Statistical Papers (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-018-1058-1
fuzzy hypothesesfuzzy statisticscreditworthinessrandomized testtest of significancealternative testhypergeometric testhypothesis testing for a proportion
Nonparametric hypothesis testing (62G10) Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics (62P05) Nonparametric inference and fuzziness (62G86)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Fuzzy \(p\)-value in testing fuzzy hypotheses with crisp data
- Testing fuzzy hypotheses based on vague observations: a \(p\)-value approach
- Fuzzy hypothesis testing with hybrid data
- Neyman-Pearson lemma for fuzzy hypotheses testing with vague data
- A fuzzy decision problem based on the generalized Neyman-Pearson criterion
- Testing fuzzy hypotheses with crisp data
- Testing statistical hypotheses with vague data
- Testing hypotheses with fuzzy data: The fuzzy \(p\)-value
- Extension of fuzzy hypothesis testing with hybrid data
- Likelihood ratio tests for fuzzy hypotheses testing
- An approach to fuzzy hypothesis testing
- Fuzzy sets
- Neyman-Pearson lemma for fuzzy hypotheses testing.
- Statistical modeling, analysis and management of fuzzy data
This page was built for publication: Randomized versus non-randomized hypergeometric hypothesis testing with crisp and fuzzy hypotheses