Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks

DOI10.1007/s10472-020-09693-4OpenAlexW3104191106MaRDI QIDQ2029707

Claudette Cayrol, Luis Fariñas del Cerro, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Jorge Fandinno

Publication date: 4 June 2021

Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/19185/1/cayrol_19185.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

abstract argumentationhigher-order attacksacceptability semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Computer science (68-XX)

Related Items (1)

RAFDivider  : a distributed algorithm for computing semantics in higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks

Uses Software

• AFRA

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support
• Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• Argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks and evidence-based supports
• Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations
• Coherence in finite argument systems.
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
• Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview
• Inductive Defense for Sceptical Semantics of Extended Argumentation
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning

This page was built for publication: Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks