Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff

DOI10.1007/s10100-020-00728-zOpenAlexW3118532597MaRDI QIDQ2033305

Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli, Eduarda Asfora Frej

Publication date: 16 June 2021

Published in: CEJOR. Central European Journal of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00728-z

zbMATH Keywords

flexibilitypreference modellingelicitation by decompositionFITradeoff methodholistic evaluationmulti-criteria decision making/aiding (MCDM/A)

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Operations research and management science (90Bxx)

Related Items

The use of the success‐based decision rule to support the holistic evaluation process in FITradeoff ⋮ A multicriteria model to support the selection of inspection service providers based on the delay time model ⋮ Best-worst tradeoff method ⋮ Analysis of the cognitive aspects of the preference elicitation process in the compensatory context: a neuroscience experiment with FITradeoff ⋮ A tribute to Rudolf vetschera

Uses Software

• M-MACBETH
• UTA Plus
• FITradeoff

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys. In 2 volumes
• A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff
• Multicriteria and multiobjective models for risk, reliability and maintenance decision analysis
• A parallel between regret theory and outranking methods for multicriteria decision making under imprecise information
• Kernel-based learning methods for preference aggregation
• Decision making with incomplete information
• Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision- making, the UTA method
• Heuristics for selecting pair-wise elicitation questions in multiple criteria choice problems
• A multicriteria decision model for supplier selection in a food industry based on fitradeoff method
• A benefit-to-cost ratio based approach for portfolio selection under multiple criteria with incomplete preference information
• Preface: Operations research in neuroscience. II
• Modeling assignment-based pairwise comparisons within integrated framework for value-driven multiple criteria sorting
• Exploring cognitive aspects of FITradeoff method using neuroscience tools
• Comparison of Weighting Judgments in Multiattribute Utility Measurement