Statistical methods for replicability assessment

DOI10.1214/20-AOAS1336zbMath1470.62173arXiv1903.08747OpenAlexW3088845782MaRDI QIDQ2044228

Kenneth Hung, William Fithian

Publication date: 4 August 2021

Published in: The Annals of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08747

zbMATH Keywords

multiple testingmeta-analysisreplicabilitypublication biaspostselection inference

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Estimation in multivariate analysis (62H12) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Related Items (1)

Replicability across multiple studies

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Exact post-selection inference, with application to the Lasso
• Type S error for classical and Bayesian single and multiple comparison procedures
• Screening for Partial Conjunction Hypotheses
• Adjusted Bayesian Inference for Selected Parameters
• A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
• Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis
• Selection Adjusted Confidence Intervals With More Power to Determine the Sign
• Drop-the-Losers Design: Normal Case
• False Discovery Rate–Adjusted Multiple Confidence Intervals for Selected Parameters

This page was built for publication: Statistical methods for replicability assessment