Experimental evidence of behavioral improvement by learning and intermediate advice

DOI10.1007/S11238-020-09799-5zbMath1467.91029OpenAlexW3129169200MaRDI QIDQ2046164

Daniela Di Cagno, Noemi Pace, Güth, Werner

Publication date: 17 August 2021

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-020-09799-5

zbMATH Keywords

experimentssatisficing(un)bounded rationalityintermediate advice

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Portfolio theory (91G10) Experimental work for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance (91-05)

Uses Software

• Z-Tree
• ORSEE

Cites Work

• Behavioral patterns and reduction of sub-optimality: an experimental choice analysis
• When and how to satisfice: an experimental investigation
• Optimize, satisfice, or choose without deliberation? A simple minimax-regret assessment
• (Sub) optimality and (non) optimal satisficing in risky decision experiments
• Money does not induce risk neutral behavior, but binary lotteries do even worse
• Efficient equilibrium selection in evolutionary games with random matching
• States of nature and states of mind: a generalized theory of decision-making
• Imitation-theory and experimental evidence
• The Evolution of Walrasian Behavior
• Behavioral Hazard in Health Insurance *

This page was built for publication: Experimental evidence of behavioral improvement by learning and intermediate advice