A pragmatic argument against equal weighting

DOI10.1007/s11229-017-1651-1zbMath1474.62006OpenAlexW2771361373MaRDI QIDQ2052625

Ittay Nissan-Rozen, Levi Spectre

Publication date: 26 November 2021

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://philpapers.org/rec/NISAPA-2

zbMATH Keywords

expected utility maximizationBayesian conditionalizationlinear poolingpeer disagreementequal weight view

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
• Testimony as evidence: more problems for linear pooling
• Reaching a consensus
• Disagreement and Evidential Attenuation

This page was built for publication: A pragmatic argument against equal weighting