Why is the universe of sets not a set?

DOI10.1007/S11229-017-1513-XzbMath1475.03051OpenAlexW2742805272MaRDI QIDQ2054117

Zeynep Soysal

Publication date: 1 December 2021

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/13289/1/Final%20Manuscript%20Synthese.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

actualismuniverse of setsiterative conception of setpotentialism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Set theory (03E99)

Related Items (1)

LEVEL THEORY, PART 2: AXIOMATIZING THE BARE IDEA OF A POTENTIAL HIERARCHY

Cites Work

• The iterative conception of set. A (bi-)modal axiomatisation
• Zur Axiomatik der Mengenlehre
• Sets and classes. On the work by Paul Bernays
• On the consistency of a slight (?) modification of Quine's 'New Foundations'
• Foundations of set theory. With the collaboration of Dirk van Dalen. 2nd revised ed
• Strong axioms of infinity in NFU
• Believing the axioms. I
• Mathematics and Bleak House
• Plural Quantification and Classes†
• THE POTENTIAL HIERARCHY OF SETS
• Sets and Classes
• Consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis. (AM-3)
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Why is the universe of sets not a set?