Can we resolve the continuum hypothesis?

DOI10.1007/s11229-017-1648-9zbMath1475.03034OpenAlexW2771436571MaRDI QIDQ2054119

Shivaram Lingamneni

Publication date: 1 December 2021

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1648-9

zbMATH Keywords

set theoryincompletenessfoundations of mathematicsstructuralismphilosophy of set theory

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Continuum hypothesis and Martin's axiom (03E50)

Uses Software

• MathOverflow

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• All automorphisms of the Calkin algebra are inner
• The hyperuniverse program
• SUITABLE EXTENDER MODELS II: BEYOND ω-HUGE
• THE SET-THEORETIC MULTIVERSE
• Large Cardinals from Determinacy
• On Khot’s unique games conjecture
• A simple maximality principle
• What Does it Take to Prove Fermat's Last Theorem? Grothendieck and the Logic of Number Theory
• INDEFINITENESS IN SEMI-INTUITIONISTIC SET THEORIES: ON A CONJECTURE OF FEFERMAN
• Multiversism and Concepts of Set: How Much Relativism Is Acceptable?
• Countable tightness and proper forcing
• Forcing isomorphism
• Structuralism, Invariance, and Univalence
• RESTRICTIVENESS RELATIVE TO NOTIONS OF INTERPRETATION
• Does Mathematics Need New Axioms?
• Defending the Axioms
• On reflection principles

This page was built for publication: Can we resolve the continuum hypothesis?