Maximality and ontology: how axiom content varies across philosophical frameworks

DOI10.1007/s11229-017-1336-9zbMath1475.03010OpenAlexW2591654713WikidataQ59607376 ScholiaQ59607376MaRDI QIDQ2054121

Neil Barton, Sy-David Friedman

Publication date: 1 December 2021

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1336-9

zbMATH Keywords

set theoryfoundations of mathematicsphilosophy of mathematicsmultiversism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Other set-theoretic hypotheses and axioms (03E65)

Related Items

Structural relativity and informal rigour, UNIVERSISM AND EXTENSIONS OF V

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Foundational implications of the inner model hypothesis
• Multiverse conceptions in set theory
• Model theory.
• Set theory. An introduction to large cardinals
• Naive infinitism: the case for an inconsistency approach to infinite collections
• On strong forms of reflection in set theory
• The hyperuniverse program
• THE SET-THEORETIC MULTIVERSE
• Richness and Reflection
• Explaining Maximality Through the Hyperuniverse Programme
• Boolos on the justification of set theory
• A minimal model for set theory
• The categoricity problem and truth-value gaps
• THE POTENTIAL HIERARCHY OF SETS
• Internal Consistency and the Inner Model Hypothesis
• Inner models for set theory—Part I
• Inner models for set theory—Part II
• Inner models for set theory – Part III
• Does Mathematics Need New Axioms?
• Defending the Axioms
• On reflection principles