Repugnant conclusions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2058872
DOI10.1007/s00355-021-01321-2zbMath1479.91127OpenAlexW4229760580MaRDI QIDQ2058872
Publication date: 10 December 2021
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01321-2
Related Items (2)
Thresholds, critical levels, and generalized sufficientarian principles ⋮ A new result on the impossibility of avoiding both the repugnant and sadistic conclusions
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Population size and the social welfare functions of Bentham and Mill
- Justifying social discounting: the rank-discounted utilitarian approach
- The tyranny of non-aggregation versus the tyranny of aggregation in social choices: a real dilemma
- Optimal population size and endogenous growth
- Critical levels and the (reverse) repugnant conclusion
- Making people happy or making happy people? Questionnaire-experimental studies of population ethics and policy
- Utilitarianism with and without expected utility
- Rank-additive population ethics
- Mere addition is equivalent to avoiding the sadistic conclusion in all plausible variable-population social orderings
- Escaping the repugnant conclusion: Rank-discounted utilitarianism with variable population
- Intertemporal Population Ethics: Critical-Level Utilitarian Principles
This page was built for publication: Repugnant conclusions
