Linking scores with patient-reported health outcome instruments: a validation study and comparison of three linking methods

DOI10.1007/S11336-021-09776-ZzbMath1477.62351OpenAlexW3173991424MaRDI QIDQ2066621

Sangdon Lim, Seung W. Choi, Benjamin D. Schalet, David Cella

Publication date: 14 January 2022

Published in: Psychometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09776-z

zbMATH Keywords

linkingdepressionscale alignmentPROMIScalibrated projectionpatient-reported outcomesPHQ-9

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Related Items (2)

Guest editors' introduction to the invited special section ⋮ Solving the tower of babel problem for patient-reported outcome measures. Comments on: ``Linking scores with patient-reported health outcome instruments: a validation study and comparison of three linking methods

Uses Software

• lavaan
• mirt
• equate
• lordif
• PROsetta
• Lord-Wingersky

Cites Work

• Lord-Wingersky algorithm version 2.0 for hierarchical item factor models with applications in test scoring, scale alignment, and model fit testing
• Test equating, scaling, and linking. Methods and practices
• Smoothing by spline functions.

This page was built for publication: Linking scores with patient-reported health outcome instruments: a validation study and comparison of three linking methods