Comparing ambiguous urns with different sizes

DOI10.1016/J.JET.2021.105224zbMath1481.91058OpenAlexW3134285913MaRDI QIDQ2067406

Emel Filiz-Ozbay, Erkut Y. Ozbay, Huseyin Gulen, Yusufcan Masatlioglu

Publication date: 18 January 2022

Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2021.105224

zbMATH Keywords

riskambiguityratio biasEllsberg's experiment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Experimental work for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance (91-05)

Cites Work

• A simplified axiomatic approach to ambiguity aversion
• The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?
• Randomization devices and the elicitation of ambiguity-averse preferences
• A theory of subjective compound lotteries
• Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities
• Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
• Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity
• Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude
• Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty
• Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
• Ambiguity and Second-Order Belief
• The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach
• Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
• Partial Ambiguity
• Perceived Ambiguity and Relevant Measures
• The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk
• Ambiguous Correlation
• A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity
• Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study
• A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Aversion

This page was built for publication: Comparing ambiguous urns with different sizes