The statistical performance of matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: estimating treatment effects with aggregate external control data
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2078757
DOI10.1214/20-AOAS1359zbMath1499.62402arXiv1910.06449OpenAlexW3117877062MaRDI QIDQ2078757
James Signorovitch, Rajeev Ayyagari, David Cheng
Publication date: 3 March 2022
Published in: The Annals of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.06449
causal inferencehealth technology assessmentindirect comparisonmatching-adjusted indirect comparison
Related Items (1)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Small-Sample Adjustments for Wald-Type Tests Using Sandwich Estimators
- Likelihood reweighting methods to reduce potential bias in noninferiority trials which rely on historical data to make inference
- Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data
- Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward
- New methods for treatment effect calibration, with applications to non-inferiority trials
- A note on overadjustment in inverse probability weighted estimation
- Covariate selection for the nonparametric estimation of an average treatment effect
- Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies
- Asymptotic Statistics
- Matching Using Estimated Propensity Scores: Relating Theory to Practice
- A Note on the Efficiency of Sandwich Covariance Matrix Estimation
- On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects
- Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting
- Stable Weights that Balance Covariates for Estimation With Incomplete Outcome Data
- Covariate Balancing Propensity Score
This page was built for publication: The statistical performance of matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: estimating treatment effects with aggregate external control data
