Conditions on which cokriging does not do better than kriging
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2079621
DOI10.1016/j.jmva.2022.105084OpenAlexW4286250150MaRDI QIDQ2079621
Publication date: 30 September 2022
Published in: Journal of Multivariate Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2022.105084
spatial predictionspatial data analysismultivariate spatial processescoregionalization covariance model
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- When doesn't cokriging outperform Kriging?
- Nonstationary modeling for multivariate spatial processes
- Interpolation of spatial data. Some theory for kriging
- Estimating deformations of stationary processes
- Reducing non-stationary random fields to stationarity and isotropy using a space deformation
- A copula model for non-Gaussian multivariate spatial data
- Nonstationary multivariate process modeling through spatially varying coregionalization
- Estimating deformations of isotropic Gaussian random fields on the plane
- Multivariate spatial modeling for geostatistical data using convolved covariance functions
- Normal Variance-Mean Mixtures and z Distributions
- Matérn Cross-Covariance Functions for Multivariate Random Fields
- Multivariate spatial covariance models: a conditional approach
- Universal co-kriging under intrinsic coregionalization
- A new form of the co-kriging equations
This page was built for publication: Conditions on which cokriging does not do better than kriging