Rescuing implicit definition from abstractionism

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-84706-7_5OpenAlexW4233787612MaRDI QIDQ2080582

Daniel Waxman

Publication date: 9 October 2022

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84706-7_5

zbMATH Keywords

Hume's principlelogicismneo-Fregeanismabstractionism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Mathematical logic and foundations (03-XX)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Double vision: two questions about the neo-Fregean program
• Focus restored: Comments on John MacFarlane
• The good, the bad and the ugly
• Introduction to the special issue on the bad company problem
• Cardinality, counting, and equinumerosity
• Neo-Fregean foundations for real analysis: Some reflections on Frege's constraint
• Reals by Abstractiont
• Science without Numbers
• Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism
• Philosophy and Model Theory
• Mathematics and Bleak House
• Some Measurement-Theoretic Concerns about Hale's ‘Reals by Abstraction'†;
• New V, ZF and Abstraction†
• On the Philosophical Significance of Frege’s Constraint†
• FREGE’S CONSTRAINT AND THE NATURE OF FREGE’S FOUNDATIONAL PROGRAM
• Is Hume's principle analytic?

This page was built for publication: Rescuing implicit definition from abstractionism