On competing definitions for the Diederich-Fornæss index
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2081432
DOI10.1007/s00209-022-03112-6OpenAlexW2956111052MaRDI QIDQ2081432
Publication date: 13 October 2022
Published in: Mathematische Zeitschrift (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.03689
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Global regularity for the \(\bar{\delta}\)-Neumann operator and bounded plurisubharmonic exhaustion functions
- De Rham cohomology of manifolds containing the points of infinite type, and Sobolev estimates for the \(\bar \partial\)-Neumann problem
- Convex defining functions for convex domains
- The order of plurisubharmonicity on pseudoconvex domains with Lipschitz boundaries
- A note on plurisubharmonic defining functions in \({\mathbb{C}^{n}}\)
- Distance to \(C^k\) hypersurfaces
- Behavior of the Bergman projection on the Diederich-Fornæss worm
- Some conditions for uniform H-convexity
- Pseudoconvex domains: An example with nontrivial nebenhuelle
- Pseudoconvex domains: bounded strictly plurisubharmonic exhaustion functions
- A Sobolev mapping property of the Bergman kernel
- The Diederich-Fornæss index. II: For domains of trivial index
- A sufficient condition for compactness of the \(\overline{\partial}\)-Neumann operator
- Hartogs domains and the Diederich-Fornæss index
- Lectures on the \(L^2\)-Sobolev theory of the \(\bar\partial\)-Neumann problem
- The Diederich-Fornæss index. I: For domains of non-trivial index
- On the Steinness index
- Defining functions for unbounded \(C^m\) domains
- A note on plurisubharmonic defining functions in \(\mathbb{C}^2\)
- Stetige streng pseudokonvexe Funktionen
- The Diederich-Fornaess index and the global regularity of the \(\bar \partial\)-Neumann problem
- CR-invariance of the Steinness index
- Curvature Measures
- A Remark on Bounded Strictly Plurisubharmonic Exhaustion Functions
- Geometric Analysis on the Diederich-Forn{\ae}ss Index
- The Diederich-Fornaess index and good vector fields
This page was built for publication: On competing definitions for the Diederich-Fornæss index
