Do spatial designs outperform classic experimental designs?
DOI10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2OpenAlexW3082061074MaRDI QIDQ2084377
Lucia Gutierrez, Raegan Hoefler, Ines Berro, Luis Diaz-Garcia, Martin Quincke, Eduardo Covarrubias, Madhav Bhatta, Jose A. R. Nunes, Alejandra Borges, Rafael S. Nalin, Pablo González-Barrios
Publication date: 18 October 2022
Published in: Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2
spatial correctionprediction accuracyexperimental designautoregressive processrandomization-based experimental designsresponse to selection
Related Items (1)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Augmented p-rep designs
- Optimal incomplete block designs for general dependence structures
- Enhanced diagnostics for the spatial analysis of field trials
- OPTIMAL DESIGN FOR EARLY-GENERATION PLANT-BREEDING TRIALS WITH UNREPLICATED OR PARTIALLY REPLICATED TEST LINES
- A Comparison of Spatial Designs for Field Variety Trials
- ggplot2
- Planning Incomplete Block Experiments When Treatments Are Genetically Related
- Comparison of Nested Simulated Annealing and Reactive Tabu Search for Efficient Experimental Designs with Correlated Data
- Statistical Analysis of Field Experiments Using Neighbouring Plots
- On Augmented Designs
- A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs
- Construction of Resolvable Designs with Nested Treatment Structure
- Analysis of Variety Yield Trials Using Two-Dimensional Separable ARIMA Processes
- Recovery of Interblock, Intergradient, and Intervariety Information in Incomplete Block and Lattice Rectangle Designed Experiments
- Construction of Resolvable Spatial Row–Column Designs
This page was built for publication: Do spatial designs outperform classic experimental designs?
