Correcting bias in survival probabilities for partially monitored populations via integrated models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2084416
DOI10.1007/s13253-020-00423-1OpenAlexW3118753877MaRDI QIDQ2084416
Blanca Sarzo, Jonas Hentati-Sundberg, David Conesa, Ruth King
Publication date: 18 October 2022
Published in: Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00423-1
Related Items (2)
Integrated population models: achieving their potential ⋮ When ecological individual heterogeneity models and large data collide: an importance sampling approach
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Maximum likelihood estimation of mark-recapture-recovery models in the presence of continuous covariates
- Parameter redundancy in capture-recapture-recovery models
- A generalised likelihood framework for partially observed capture-recapture-recovery models
- Integrated data analysis in the presence of emigration and mark loss
- Multi-site integrated population modelling
- Continuous Covariates in Mark-Recapture-Recovery Analysis: A Comparison of Methods
- Integrating Mark-Recapture-Recovery and Census Data to Estimate Animal Abundance and Demographic Parameters
- A New Method for Analysing Discrete Life History Data with Missing Covariate Values
- Closed-form likelihoods for Arnason-Schwarz models
- Integrated Recovery/Recapture Data Analysis
- Incorporating Animal Movement Into Distance Sampling
This page was built for publication: Correcting bias in survival probabilities for partially monitored populations via integrated models