The Italian referendum: what can we get from game theory?

DOI10.1007/s10479-022-04927-6zbMath1505.91314OpenAlexW4295027652MaRDI QIDQ2095940

Michela Chessa, Vito Fragnelli

Publication date: 15 November 2022

Published in: Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04927-6

zbMATH Keywords

voting gamestrategic votingdecisivenessblocking powerquorum threshold

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of game theory (91A80) Voting theory (91B12) History, political science (91F10)

Related Items (1)

Supermajority politics: equilibrium range, policy diversity, utilitarian welfare, and political compromise

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Achievable hierarchies in voting games with abstention
• Quaternary dichotomous voting rules
• Probabilistic power indices for voting rules with abstention
• Power in voting rules with abstention: an axiomatization of a two components power index
• A decisiveness index for simple games
• Banzhaf measures for games with several levels of approval in the input and output
• Protectionism and blocking power indices
• Ternary voting games
• A note on ``Measurement of disproportionality in proportional representation systems
• Weighted committee games
• Measurement of disproportionality in proportional representation systems
• Approval quorums dominate participation quorums
• Weighted voting, abstention, and multiple levels of approval
• Paradoxes of Preferential Voting
• On the Theory of Strategic Voting1

This page was built for publication: The Italian referendum: what can we get from game theory?