A fair comparison of credible and confidence intervals: an example with binomial proportions

DOI10.1007/s40300-021-00225-6OpenAlexW3217628675MaRDI QIDQ2098291

Tuany de Paula Castro, Carlos Daniel M. Paulino, Julio da Motta Singer

Publication date: 17 November 2022

Published in: Metron (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-021-00225-6

zbMATH Keywords

coverage probabilitybinomial distributionexpected lengthhighest posterior density (HPD) intervals

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites Work

• The cost of using exact confidence intervals for a binomial proportion
• Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. (With comments and a rejoinder).
• Simple and Effective Confidence Intervals for Proportions and Differences of Proportions Result from Adding Two Successes and Two Failures
• Coverage‐adjusted Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion
• Frequentist Performance of Bayesian Confidence Intervals for Comparing Proportions in 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
• Tests of Statistical Hypotheses Concerning Several Parameters When the Number of Observations is Large
• Approximate Bayesianity of Frequentist Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: A fair comparison of credible and confidence intervals: an example with binomial proportions