Agreeing to disagree with conditional probability systems
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2098948
DOI10.1515/bejte-2016-0182OpenAlexW2802882483WikidataQ129883888 ScholiaQ129883888MaRDI QIDQ2098948
Publication date: 22 November 2022
Published in: The B. E. Journal of Theoretical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2016-0182
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- The theory of extensive form games
- On consensus through communication without a commonly known protocol
- Lexicographic probability, conditional probability, and nonstandard probability
- Hierarchies of conditional beliefs and interactive epistemology in dynamic games
- Information, trade and common knowledge
- Approximating common knowledge with common beliefs
- Agreeing to disagree
- Characterizing common priors in the form of posteriors
- How to make sense of the common prior assumption under incomplete information
- Characterizing the common prior assumption.
- Strong belief and forward induction reasoning.
- Epistemic equivalence of extended belief hierarchies
- Agreeing to disagree with lexicographic prior beliefs
- Don't Bet on it: Contingent Agreements with Asymmetric Information
- On a new axiomatic theory of probability
- Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium
- Admissibility in Games
- Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players, Part III. The Basic Probability Distribution of the Game
This page was built for publication: Agreeing to disagree with conditional probability systems
