Saving and dissaving under Ramsey-Rawls criterion

DOI10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102783zbMath1505.91242OpenAlexW2943973763MaRDI QIDQ2101454

Thai Ha-Huy, Thi Tuyet Mai Nguyen

Publication date: 6 December 2022

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102783

zbMATH Keywords

maximin principleRamsey criterion\( \alpha \)-maxmin\( \epsilon \)-contaminationRawls criterion

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Economic growth models (91B62)

Related Items

A tale of two Rawlsian criteria

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Resource conservation across generations in a Ramsey-Chichilnisky model
• Subjective probability, confidence, and Bayesian updating
• Justifying social discounting: the rank-discounted utilitarian approach
• Sustainable exploitation of a natural resource: a satisfying use of Chichilnisky's criterion
• Optimal growth models with bounded or unbounded returns: A unifying approach
• A mixed Bentham-Rawls criterion for intergenerational equity: theory and implications
• Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
• \(E\)-capacities and the Ellsberg paradox
• An axiomatic approach to sustainable development
• A not so myopic axiomatization of discounting
• On maximin dynamic programming and the rate of discount
• A never-decisive and anonymous criterion for optimal growth models
• An axiomatic approach to \(\varepsilon\)-contamination
• Optimal Maximin Accumulation with Uncertain Future Technology
• Rawlsian Growth: Dynamic Programming of Capital and Wealth for Intergeneration "Maximin" Justice
• Saving and Dissaving With Hyperbolic Discounting
• On Multiple Discount Rates
• On Qualitative Probability $/sigma$-Algebras
• Aggregating Infinite Utility Streams with InterGenerational Equity: The Impossibility of Being Paretian
• Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience