The pivotal mechanism versus the voluntary contribution mechanism: an experimental comparison
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2125108
DOI10.1007/s00355-021-01350-xzbMath1484.91195OpenAlexW3201991300MaRDI QIDQ2125108
Hirofumi Yamamura, Takehiko Yamato, Junyi Shen, Takuma Wakayama, Tatsuki Homma, Ryosuke Iba
Publication date: 13 April 2022
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/DP2018-23.pdf
Public goods (91B18) Mechanism design theory (91B03) Experimental work for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance (91-05)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Secure implementation experiments: Do strategy-proof mechanisms really work?
- Incentive compatibility and individual rationality in public good economies
- Implementing a public project and distributing its cost
- Undominated Nash implementation in bounded mechanisms
- Implementation in undominated Nash equilibria without integer games
- Voluntary participation and spite in public good provision experiments: An international comparison
- Non-excludable public good experiments
- The existence of perfect equilibrium in discontinuous games
- Learning dynamics for mechanism design: an experimental comparison of public goods mechanisms
- Nash Implementation Using Undominated Strategies
- Incentives in Teams
- Provision of Public Goods: Fully Implementing the Core through Private Contributions
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
- Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
- Implementation via Augmented Revelation Mechanisms
This page was built for publication: The pivotal mechanism versus the voluntary contribution mechanism: an experimental comparison