A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2129238
DOI10.1186/S40488-021-00121-4OpenAlexW3175648361MaRDI QIDQ2129238
Publication date: 22 April 2022
Published in: Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40488-021-00121-4
Related Items (3)
Addressing overdispersion and zero-inflation for clustered count data via new multilevel heterogenous hurdle models ⋮ A new exponentially weighted moving average control chart to monitor count data with applications in healthcare and manufacturing ⋮ Decline, adopt or compromise? A dual hurdle model for advice utilization
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses
- Using the Standardized Difference to Compare the Prevalence of a Binary Variable Between Two Groups in Observational Research
- Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression, with an Application to Defects in Manufacturing
- Some remarks on overdispersion
- Zero‐Altered and other Regression Models for Count Data with Added Zeros
- A Bayesian model for repeated measures zero-inflated count data with application to outpatient psychiatric service use
- Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Mixed Regression Modeling of Over-Dispersed Count Data with Extra Zeros
- Zero-inflated and overdispersed: what's one to do?
- Random effect models for repeated measures of zero-inflated count data
- Zero-inflated models for adjusting varying exposures: a cautionary note on the pitfalls of using offset
This page was built for publication: A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data
