Mathematical Research Data Initiative
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Create a new Item
Create a new Property
Create a new EntitySchema
Merge two items
In other projects
Discussion
View source
View history
Purge
English
Log in

Is cut-free logic fit for unrestricted abstraction?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2131274
Jump to:navigation, search

DOI10.1016/j.apal.2022.103101OpenAlexW4210793706MaRDI QIDQ2131274

Uwe Petersen

Publication date: 25 April 2022

Published in: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2022.103101

zbMATH Keywords

paradoxesinductiondialetheismreflection principle


Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Paraconsistent logics (03B53) Provability logics and related algebras (e.g., diagonalizable algebras) (03F45) Gödel numberings and issues of incompleteness (03F40) Higher-order logic (03B16)


Related Items

Dialetheias and numbers distinct from themselves



Cites Work

  • Proof theory. 2nd ed
  • Logic without contraction as based on inclusion and unrestricted abstraction
  • Syntactical and semantical properties of simple type theory
  • A nonconstructive proof of Gentzen’s Hauptsatz for second order predicate logic
  • Truth Definitions and Consistency Proofs
  • Unnamed Item
  • Unnamed Item
  • Unnamed Item
  • Unnamed Item
  • Unnamed Item
  • Unnamed Item
  • Unnamed Item
  • Unnamed Item
Retrieved from "https://portal.mardi4nfdi.de/w/index.php?title=Publication:2131274&oldid=14635342"
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Printable version
Permanent link
Page information
MaRDI portal item
This page was last edited on 2 February 2024, at 00:10.
Privacy policy
About MaRDI portal
Disclaimers
Imprint
Powered by MediaWiki