Hardness and efficiency on minimizing maximum distances for graphs with few \(P_4\)'s and \((k, \ell)\)-graphs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2132367
DOI10.1016/j.entcs.2019.08.032OpenAlexW2978275643WikidataQ113317400 ScholiaQ113317400MaRDI QIDQ2132367
Publication date: 27 April 2022
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2019.08.032
\((2, 1)\)-chordal graphs\((k, \ell)\)-graphs\textsf{P} vs \textsf{NP}-c dichotomygraphs with few \(P_4\)'sstretch index
Related Items (3)
Strategies for generating tree spanners: algorithms, heuristics and optimal graph classes ⋮ Hardness and efficiency on \(t\)-admissibility for graph operations ⋮ Edge tree spanners
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Tree 3-spanners in 2-sep chordal graphs: characterization and algorithms
- On the minimum diameter spanning tree problem
- Tree spanners for bipartite graphs and probe interval graphs
- A tree representation for \(P_ 4\)-sparse graphs
- Tree spanners on chordal graphs: complexity and algorithms
- Partitions of graphs into one or two independent sets and cliques
- Tree \(t\)-spanners of a graph: minimizing maximum distances efficiently
- Tree Spanners
- P-Components and the Homogeneous Decomposition of Graphs
- Advancing the Transposition Distance and Diameter through Lonely Permutations
- Min-Max Graph Partitioning and Small Set Expansion
This page was built for publication: Hardness and efficiency on minimizing maximum distances for graphs with few \(P_4\)'s and \((k, \ell)\)-graphs