A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2146014
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_14OpenAlexW3199629518MaRDI QIDQ2146014
Publication date: 15 June 2022
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86772-0_14
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities
- Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- The anomalous extension problem in default reasoning
- Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- Conflict-Tolerant Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
- Two Aspects of Relevance in Structured Argumentation: Minimality and Paraconsistency
This page was built for publication: A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation
