Intention-to-treat comparisons in randomized trials
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2163074
DOI10.1214/21-STS830MaRDI QIDQ2163074
Ross L. Prentice, Aaron K. Aragaki
Publication date: 10 August 2022
Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://projecteuclid.org/journals/statistical-science/volume-37/issue-3/Intention-to-Treat-Comparisons-in-Randomized-Trials/10.1214/21-STS830.full
Related Items
Cox (1972): recollections and reflections ⋮ On the targets of inference with multivariate failure time data
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Does Cox analysis of a randomized survival study yield a causal treatment effect?
- Cox's regression model for counting processes: A large sample study
- Information and asymptotic efficiency in parametric-nonparametric models
- Errata to ``A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period. Application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect
- Time-dependent coefficients in a Cox-type regression model
- Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization
- Inefficient estimators of the bivariate survival function for three models
- Subtleties in the interpretation of hazard contrasts
- Proportional hazards regression.
- On semi-competing risks data
- On the restricted mean survival time curve in survival analysis
- Properties of Proportional-Hazards Score Tests under Misspecified Regression Models
- Misspecified proportional hazard models
- Estimation of the average hazard ratio
- Partial likelihood
- Marginal Regression Models for Multivariate Failure Time Data
- Multistate Models for the Analysis of Life History Data
- Causality: Some Statistical Aspects
- Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models
- The Statistical Analysis of Multivariate Failure Time Data
- Statistical models based on counting processes
- Regression Models and Multivariate Life Tables
This page was built for publication: Intention-to-treat comparisons in randomized trials