Can \(p\)-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling?
DOI10.1214/20-SS129zbMath1443.62021OpenAlexW3013375568MaRDI QIDQ2191897
Claudia Becker, Sven Grüner, Antje Jantsch, Norbert Hirschauer, Oliver Mußhoff
Publication date: 26 June 2020
Published in: Statistics Surveys (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ssu/1585274548
random sampling\(p\)-valuespropensity scoressampling designsestimation and testingnon-random sampling
Applications of statistics to economics (62P20) Applications of statistics to social sciences (62P25) Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to statistics (62-02) Statistical block designs (62K10)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Practical tools for designing and weighting survey samples
- Two-step estimation of panel data models with censored endogenous variables and selection bias
- Pitfalls of significance testing and \(p\)-value variability: an econometrics perspective
- Clustered data with small sample sizes: Comparing the performance of model-based and design-based approaches
- Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: A Comment
- Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
- Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme
- Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences
- Microeconometrics
- Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
- Five Nonobvious Changes in Editorial Practice for Editors and Reviewers to Consider When Evaluating Submissions in a Post p < 0.05 Universe
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- Design of observational studies
This page was built for publication: Can \(p\)-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling?
