Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting

DOI10.1007/s00355-020-01300-zzbMath1480.91091OpenAlexW3081990856MaRDI QIDQ2235100

Antoinette Baujard, Herrade Igersheim, Isabelle Lebon

Publication date: 20 October 2021

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01300-z

zbMATH Keywords

evaluative votingalternative votingelectoral experiment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Voting theory (91B12) History, political science (91F10) Experimental work for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance (91-05)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A general scoring rule
• Dis\&approval voting: a characterization
• A `threshold aggregation' of three-graded rankings
• Comparison of scoring rules in Poisson voting games
• Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting
• Preference intensity representation: strategic overstating in large elections
• Dilemma with approval and disapproval votes
• Why votes have value: instrumental voting with overconfidence and overestimation of others' errors
• Formal utilitarianism and range voting
• Voter turnout as a participation game: An experimental investigation
• Relative Utilitarianism

This page was built for publication: Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting