Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian ranking models: Case V, Case III, or neither?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2250630
DOI10.1007/BF02294376zbMath1291.62247OpenAlexW2054191705MaRDI QIDQ2250630
Publication date: 18 July 2014
Published in: Psychometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294376
Related Items (11)
Linking item response model parameters ⋮ A hierarchical model for accuracy and choice on standardized tests ⋮ Equivalent linear logistic test models ⋮ Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian paired comparison models under multiple judgment ⋮ The repeated insertion model for rankings: missing link between two subset choice models ⋮ Thurstonian-based analyses: past, present, and future utilities ⋮ A Bayesian multinomial probit model for the analysis of panel choice data ⋮ Identifiability and equivalence of GLLIRM models ⋮ Models for paired comparison data: a review with emphasis on dependent data ⋮ Two-level linear paired comparison models: Estimation and identifiability issues ⋮ Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for preference data
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- A maximum likelihood method for fitting the wandering vector model
- Factor and ideal point analysis for interpersonally incomparable data
- The wandering ideal point model: A probabilistic multidimensional unfolding model for paired comparisons data
- Thurstonian psychophysics: Case III
- Covariance structure analysis of ordinal ipsative data
- A solution for case III of the law of comparative judgment
- A Conditional Probit Model for Qualitative Choice: Discrete Decisions Recognizing Interdependence and Heterogeneous Preferences
- A GENERAL PROCEDURE FOR PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR THE LAW OF COMPARATIVE JUDGEMENT
- Multistage Ranking Models
- An Approach for Quantifying Paired Comparisons and Rank Order
This page was built for publication: Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian ranking models: Case V, Case III, or neither?
