Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian paired comparison models under multiple judgment

DOI10.1007/BF02294732zbMath1306.62509OpenAlexW2004850581MaRDI QIDQ2259877

Rung-Ching Tsai

Publication date: 5 March 2015

Published in: Psychometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294732

zbMATH Keywords

identifiabilitymultiple judgmentThurstonian paired comparison models

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Related Items (6)

A hierarchical model for accuracy and choice on standardized tests ⋮ Thurstonian-based analyses: past, present, and future utilities ⋮ Modelling intransitive preferences: a random-effects approach ⋮ A Bayesian multinomial probit model for the analysis of panel choice data ⋮ Discrete choice models for ordinal response variables: a generalization of the stereotype model ⋮ Models for paired comparison data: a review with emphasis on dependent data

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Two-level linear paired comparison models: Estimation and identifiability issues
• Covariance structure analysis of ordinal ipsative data
• Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian ranking models: Case V, Case III, or neither?
• Book review of: Tom Wansbeek and Erik Meijer, Measurement error and latent variables in econometrics
• Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for paired comparison data under multiple judgment sampling
• A rational origin obtained by the method of contingent paired comparisons
• Normal Order Statistics as Permutation Probability Models
• A GENERAL PROCEDURE FOR PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR THE LAW OF COMPARATIVE JUDGEMENT
• An Approach for Quantifying Paired Comparisons and Rank Order

This page was built for publication: Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian paired comparison models under multiple judgment