Niels Bohr as philosopher of experiment: does decoherence theory challenge bohr's doctrine of classical concepts?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2261518
DOI10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.01.005zbMath1307.81007arXiv1502.06547OpenAlexW2147224506MaRDI QIDQ2261518
Kristian Camilleri, Maximilian Schlosshauer
Publication date: 6 March 2015
Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.06547
Copenhagen interpretationquantum-to-classical transitionclassical conceptsenvironmental decoherenceniels Bohr
General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15) Physics (00A79) Open systems, reduced dynamics, master equations, decoherence (81S22)
Related Items
Agents in Healey’s Pragmatist Quantum Theory: A Comparison with Pitowsky’s Approach to Quantum Mechanics, How human and nature shake hands: The role of no-conspiracy in physical theories, Quantum discreteness is an illusion, Niels Bohr on the wave function and the classical/quantum divide, Critique of quantum optical experimental refutations of Bohr's principle of complementarity, of the Wootters-Zurek principle of complementarity, and of the particle-wave duality relation
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- A history of entanglement: decoherence and the interpretation problem
- Heisenberg (and Schrödinger, and Pauli) on hidden variables
- The origin of the Everettian heresy
- The Kantian framework of complementarity
- Reading Bohr: physics and philosophy
- Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
- Quantum theory of measurement and ergodicity conditions
- Bananaworld
- Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?
- ON THE NOTIONS OF CAUSALITY AND COMPLEMENTARITY1
