The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2270220
DOI10.1007/s11238-009-9186-7zbMath1202.91073OpenAlexW2148823413MaRDI QIDQ2270220
Christian List, Franz Dietrich
Publication date: 15 March 2010
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/20067/1/The_impossibility_of_unbiased_judgment_aggregation_%28LSERO%29.pdf
Related Items (7)
The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory ⋮ Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation ⋮ Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case ⋮ Introduction to judgment aggregation ⋮ Abstract Arrowian aggregation ⋮ Majority voting on restricted domains ⋮ The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
Cites Work
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
- On the theory of aggregation
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- The limits of epistemic democracy
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision
This page was built for publication: The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
