How accurate are finite elements on anisotropic triangulations in the maximum norm?

DOI10.1016/j.cam.2019.06.032zbMath1431.65203arXiv1811.05353OpenAlexW2900996535WikidataQ114202079 ScholiaQ114202079MaRDI QIDQ2279861

Natalia Kopteva

Publication date: 16 December 2019

Published in: Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.05353

zbMATH Keywords

anisotropic diffusionlayer solutionsmaximum normLagrange finite elementsanisotropic triangulation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N15) Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N30) Laplace operator, Helmholtz equation (reduced wave equation), Poisson equation (35J05)

Related Items

Why Do We Need Voronoi Cells and Delaunay Meshes?, Why do we need Voronoi cells and Delaunay meshes? Essential properties of the Voronoi finite volume method

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Maximum-norm a posteriori error estimates for singularly perturbed elliptic reaction-diffusion problems
• Pointwise a posteriori error estimates for monotone semi-linear equations
• Linear finite elements may be only first-order pointwise accurate on anisotropic triangulations
• On the Finite Element Method for Singularly Perturbed Reaction-Diffusion Problems in Two and One Dimensions
• On the Quasi-Optimality in $L_\infty$ of the $\overset{\circ}{H}^1$-Projection into Finite Element Spaces*
• The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods