Empirical study on human evaluation of complex argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_7OpenAlexW2944097144MaRDI QIDQ2296700

Mathieu Guillaume, Marcos Cramer

Publication date: 18 February 2020

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10552

zbMATH Keywords

abstract argumentationargumentation semanticsempirical cognitive study

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Related Items (5)

Logic Programming, Argumentation and Human Reasoning ⋮ Paracoherent Answer Set Semantics meets Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ The choice-preferred semantics for relevance-oriented acceptance of admissible sets of arguments ⋮ Explanations of non-monotonic inference in admissibility-based abstract argumentation ⋮ On the Decomposition of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and the Complexity of Naive-based Semantics

This page was built for publication: Empirical study on human evaluation of complex argumentation frameworks