A formal framework for deliberated judgment

DOI10.1007/s11238-019-09722-7zbMath1433.91054arXiv1801.05644OpenAlexW3105302686WikidataQ127146898 ScholiaQ127146898MaRDI QIDQ2300615

Y. Meinard, Olivier Cailloux

Publication date: 27 February 2020

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.05644

zbMATH Keywords

decision analysismethodologyjustificationempirical validation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Related Items

On justifying the norms underlying decision support

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
• A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model
• Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
• Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• Model legitimisation in operational research
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
• Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Transl. from the French by Mark R. McCord
• A Reason-Based Theory of Rational Choice *
• Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• A General Framework for Argumentation-Based Negotiation